As part of the field experiment that I have been conducting for the past 17 days with this article
I am moving on to phase 3 today by soliciting you again and proposing the following:
I would like you to write a comment on the subject
See at the bottom, the simple form, it looks like this:
Menstruation
This comment should be at least 30 words long and should be as constructive as possible.
I’m not waiting for you to think the article is great or to say that I’m the best, I’d like constructive, additional questions, in-depth reflections.
This effort will bring you a link to your profile, I recommend it.
- LinkedIn,
- Google+
- or other social,
but I’ll let the links to your website go through, and it’s follow.
Know that it will be on your name, because I will not let optimized anchors pass on the “Name” field (that’s bad)
The idea is also to break the neck of a preconceived idea that propagates the fact that sending too many links to sites with themes other than the blog is penalizing for the page.
I offer a “content quality” audit to the first 50 participants in this experience.
This audit is very serious, it analyzes the content of your pages and identifies the onpage SEO weaknesses of each of them. It explains the best practices for each criterion and gives you the list of the URLs of the pages considered weak on this or that point.
All you have to do is click on the identified URLs and work in the right direction according to the advice of the audit.
10 days only
This proposal is open for 10 days, after which comments will be closed (but the links will remain).
For those who have not followed the first steps, you should know that I am carrying out a full-scale test on the impact of small external actions deemed “useless”, of little importance “or even “risky” in order to demonstrate that certain preconceived ideas in SEO should be less propagated or are true.
In short:
I exchange a non-spammer comment of about thirty words or more for a link and a quality audit of your free web content.
Does that sound honest to you? If so, go for it.
The article is here
For the comment box:
This is it
If you didn’t click on the G+ of the article, take advantage of it, that was step 2.